A Unitarian Perspective on Community, Authenticity, and Growth in the Zoom Era

The 2020 pandemic triggered a dramatic shift in our day-to-day lives, thrusting us into an era of digital dependence. Among the many affected areas was a religious practice, as places of worship moved their services online. Zoom and other video conferencing tools became the 'new normal' for congregations, providing a digital bridge for the faithful during periods of lockdown and social distancing. However, as we strive for adaptability, we must ask: Does this technological solution truly serve the mission of the church, specifically for Unitarian congregations?

Here is my argument against Zoom church services, which I believe to be a detriment to the pillars of our faith: Community, Relationship, and Authenticity.

Lack of Authentic Connection and Interaction

In a physical church, the collective energy, shared experiences, and the sense of communal belonging are palpable. During the service, as a minister, I read the room, sensing the congregation's responses and adjusting accordingly. The nuances of body language, the audible responses to sermons, the shared smiles, tears, and moments of reflection - these cannot be replicated on a screen.

Zoom, while helpful as a tool for communication, may encourage passivity and disconnection. The informality of meeting from one's living room or switching off the video disconnects us from the communal experience, making us mere spectators rather than active participants in the service.

Technological Barriers and Limitations

While technology has been a boon in connecting people remotely, it does come with its challenges. Signal issues, audio-visual mishaps, and the necessity for technical expertise can detract from the spiritual experience. As ministers, we are called to serve and lead our congregations in spiritual matters, not to grapple with the technicalities of a video call.



Threat to Physical Community

The advent of Zoom services can make us complacent, questioning the need for a physical space of worship. Yet, there is a profound significance in gathering at a sacred place, distinct from our everyday environments. Stepping into a church is a symbolic act of transitioning into a spiritual realm, a communal space where we can connect with others and with our faith on a deeper level.

Implications for Church Growth

For Unitarian congregations, community growth is of utmost importance. While Zoom allows for wider reach - connecting individuals from far corners of the world - it may limit our ability to create strong, local communities. People might attend the service, but without the physical presence and participation, we risk cultivating a sense of superficial engagement rather than deep, meaningful connections.

Zoom represents a certain level of isolation and artificiality that directly contradicts our call to authentic community and relationship. It is indeed a useful tool, but it should not replace the inherent value of physical church gatherings. As we navigate the post-pandemic world, we must consider the impact of our choices on the growth, authenticity, and communal strength of our congregations. After all, the essence of the church lies not in the buildings or technologies we use, but in the depth of our relationships and the authenticity of our community.

While technology cannot replicate the fullness of physical communal worship, it is worth considering alternatives that may better align with our mission of fostering authentic community, relationships, and spiritual growth. Two such options are YouTube services and church E-Newsletters.

YouTube Services: Passive Viewing vs Active Participation

YouTube services offer a unique advantage over Zoom. They are designed to be watched at the viewer's convenience, allowing for pause, replay, or skipping parts as desired. This option does not demand real-time participation, which can be a relief for those struggling with the informality and technical difficulties associated with Zoom. However, it is important to recognize that the passive viewing nature of YouTube services does not encourage active participation. It serves more as a broadcast of spiritual content rather than an interactive communal worship.

Church E-Newsletters: An Intimate Connection

Church E-Newsletters can serve as another valuable alternative to Zoom services. These newsletters, sent out weekly, can be personalized to cater to the congregation's spiritual needs and can be read at one's own pace, in the comfort of one's home or anywhere else. The flexibility and personal touch of E-Newsletters can nurture a sense of intimacy and connection that might be lacking in Zoom services.

Moreover, E-Newsletters are accessible even to those who struggle with technology. They can be read aloud by family members to those who may find reading difficult, thereby fostering interpersonal connections. The inclusion of prayers, reflections, and other spiritual content allows individuals to engage with their faith in a personal and meaningful way.

While these alternatives – YouTube services and E-Newsletters – do not substitute the experience of in-person service, they do offer a better balance between maintaining connection and preserving the sanctity of church services.

Ultimately, we need to be careful not to let the convenience of digital solutions overshadow the core purpose of our church – to cultivate a community of authentic relationships and spiritual growth. As we transition into a new era of church operation, it is essential to remain focused on this mission, employing technology as a tool rather than a replacement for communal worship. The power of the church lies not in how many digital attendees we have, but in how deeply we can touch and transform lives through genuine spiritual connections.

The church, in its essence, is not a building or a digital platform, but a community of individuals seeking spiritual growth and authentic relationships. As Unitarians, we must hold steadfast to this understanding in our quest for growth. Each decision we make, each method we choose to deliver our message, has profound implications for this growth.

However, the adoption of Zoom for church services presents significant challenges that could potentially hinder this growth, for the following reasons:

Limited Engagement and Participation

While Zoom may allow for greater reach, attracting individuals from various locations, it may lead to limited engagement and participation due to its passive nature. The lack of physical interaction, coupled with the potential for technical difficulties, can result in a detached audience, reducing the likelihood of fostering a thriving and connected community.

Weakening of Community Bonds

The absence of physical connection and shared experiences in a Zoom setting can lead to the weakening of community bonds. The digital divide, the lack of intimacy, and the feeling of isolation that may be associated with Zoom services can undermine the sense of belonging essential for community growth.

Missed Opportunities for Personal Growth

Church growth is not merely about increasing numbers; it is about nurturing spiritual and personal growth within each member. The disconnect caused by Zoom can limit opportunities for personal interactions, shared learning, and collective spiritual development, all of which are integral to the growth of a church.

Neglect of Local Community Engagement

The emphasis on digital reach with Zoom might detract from the focus on local community engagement. Engaging with the local community, serving their needs, and participating in local events are pivotal for church growth and may be overlooked in a purely digital format.

While we acknowledge the widespread use of Zoom for church services as a response to the pandemic, we need to critically evaluate its long-term implications. Growth, in the context of a church, is not just about expanding our audience; it is about cultivating a connected, engaged, and spiritually vibrant community. As we move forward, let's recommit to this vision, using technology as a tool, not a substitute, for our cherished communal worship. And as we navigate the digital landscape, we must constantly question: Does this aid in fostering the authentic relationships and community that form the bedrock of our church? If the answer is no, perhaps it's time to rethink our approach.

Comments